The way women are portrayed in Hindi films is
one thing that disturbs me the most when I watch them. The directors
are not able to see them in a proper perspective. In fact, the
pity is that they fail miserably even in attempting to show what
constitutes a woman. In most of the romantic as well as epic stories,
the scriptwriter makes the women characters speak certain dialogues
that reveal them basically as people engaged in arousing male
desire. We cannot make out what else they are as women. It looks
as if what comes out of a woman's mouth is what a man wants to
say. Yes, there is no doubt that the woman presented on the screen
looks like a woman but she is unable to express the real thoughts
of a woman. What is depicted is not truly a woman.
Why is this so? Why should an actress fail to
portray a definite image? Whose fault is it? That of the actress?
I don't think so. I blame the scriptwriter entirely. The language
he uses go totally against women's nature; he makes women speak
words which even a shameless prostitute will not utter. It is
not as if the directors are not to be blamed. It is not only the
dialogues, the facial expressions also matter. One does not know
how to talk about this for often the face of the woman character
reveals nothing; there is no expression at all.
I know why the directors and scriptwriters cannot
portray women for what they are. They are, after all, men. They
lack the keen insight of a poet or a writer. They are not capable
of understanding the heart of a woman. Many of them are also young
and inexperienced and therefore male brutality gets easily reflected
even in female characters. Can't the film Bhartuhari be an example
of this? Will not Heer Ranja bear out my statement? There are
other examples apart from these two. But these two will suffice
when we speak of the current films.
Pingla was Bhartuhari's queen at a time when
our Arya bhoomi was at the height of its glory. Pingla may be
adultrous or unfaithful or whatever, but how can such preposterous
words ensue from her mouth?
The king has given me this fruit so that I remain
immortal and satisfy his desire. But why? Why can't this fruit
be given to a man who will satisfy my desire?"
Those who have a heart must know where to place
such words. This is an insult to all womankind. Queen Pingla may
be a lowly woman but can she utter such words? These words do
not reveal a woman's heart but reflect the mentality of the film-maker.
And that is the truth! It is male brutality that permeates the
film. Indian women hardly see films. It is only when some mythological
films come that they run to see them. And what do they see but
such images of themselves?
What do we see in a film like Heer Ranja? An
innocent rural girl tells a king in the very first meeting, "Oh
king, my thirsty soul desires something which I see you have."
Can a rural girl throw away her modesty so readily? Is it possible?
She does not stop with this. This shameless woman goes and sits
close to him with an expressionless face. What is the point of
writing such meaningless dialogues? A woman who has never known
love, can she utter such words without blushing or feeling shy
when she takes a step in this direction? Don't you think a man
has entered her body? And that man is not a simple person but
a very crude one who can only speak such words. Can Heer - an
Arya stree - speak such language? How can someone who is worshipped
as a goddess even imagine this language?My comments have become
too long but the point I would like to make is that film directors
must now stop disgracing women. I also would like to state that
not even a young woman who has grown up with freedom in the present
period will be able to speak in one single breath the kind of
dialogue of Heer! Perhaps the director will say in his defence
that Heer and Ranja were unusual kind of lovers. That their love
at first sight was a passionate one! So be it! But even in such
love there should be a modicum of modesty. Even an eminent writer
like Shakespeare who understood human psychology has not described
love this way. Does being in love mean to cast away all sense
of shame? How terrible! And how totally impossible!
The present article is to raise a voice against
such portrayals. If we don't raise our voice film-makers will
continue to portray women wrongly.
There is one more thing which I would like to
mention -- inappropriate kissing scenes. As soon as the beloved
meets the lover, they start kissing each other as if driven by
somebody or as if they want to get rid of some heavy weight they
are carrying. Such meaningless activities are not needed. Kisses
are supposed to come from the heart and are not some mechanical
acts!
I do not blame all directors here. There are
many good directors who do not rely on such scenes for making
their films successful. They take care about the dialogues and
the storyline. Nek Abala, Subah ka Sitara are examples I can offer.
I hope the directors use their intelligence and understanding
of human psychology while making films.